Can anyone help? I believe we are a victim of a loan company's internal policy of "upsell" and volume over riders resulting in a Scottish/English jurisdiction dispute. The first cold call by LoanMaker, (now in default) who was a broker for Nemo back in January 2007, then in quick succession contacted by Nemo’s upsell department resulting in a secured loan on our property, done on a self cert of our income, which was based on a business plan for projected income, we could only afford 26 monthly repayments some of which was paid by credit card, we then ceased repayments as our income could not cover repayments. It has been an ongoing legal battle which started in Manchester and has now moved to Scotland for repossession. Does anyone else think that Nemo’s legal team (EVERSHEDS) who are a multinational law firm specialising in Jurisdiction and Consumer law runs rings around the County court judges and Sheriffs in Scotland leaving the individual consumer no chance of a fair hearing or justice, due to restrictions of funding in legal aid and the institutions attitude of (you accepted the loan, now pay up or get out) with very few if any local solicitors who specialise in consumer law. Even the solicitors say it's totally unfair the way that they manipulated and used the knowledge of consumer law to the advantage of their client Nemo, and not treating the consumer in a fair and balanced manor. It has got to the point the only way out is to become a social tenant in my own property to clear mis-sold loans.
Loan companies using multinational law companies V individual
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire