Just read the Supreme Court decision in Scott v southern pacific. Am I right their lordships in conclusion hinted that anything pleaded which may have been critical of how the lender behaved would have been gratefully received.?
those particular lenders generally had a cosy relationship with supplying brokers and informally must have been aware all was not as it seemed from the off
those particular lenders generally had a cosy relationship with supplying brokers and informally must have been aware all was not as it seemed from the off
Sale and rent back
